Skip to main content

Why We Hold Forever: Our Approach to Permanent Capital

Most private equity operates on a 5-7 year fund cycle. We believe the best software companies deserve a longer time horizon. Here's why we've structured GASJ as a permanent capital vehicle.

GASJ Team8 min read

The Problem with Fund Cycles

Traditional private equity funds have a structural problem: they must return capital to LPs within a defined window, typically 5-7 years. This creates misaligned incentives. Fund managers are optimizing for IRR, which often means selling great companies too early or over-leveraging to boost returns.

For software companies, this timeline is particularly problematic. The best software businesses compound value over decades. Selling a company generating 30% annual returns after 5 years to juice IRR destroys long-term value.

Permanent Capital Changes Everything

We structured GASJ as a permanent capital vehicle. We have no obligation to sell. This simple structural change cascades through every decision we make:

Investment Selection: We can own "boring" but durable businesses that compound at 15-20% annually. We don't need to chase high-risk, high-return opportunities to hit fund return targets.

Operational Decisions: We can invest in initiatives with 5+ year payoffs. R&D projects, platform migrations, market expansions—all become viable when you're not racing a fund clock.

Management Alignment: Operators can focus on building enduring businesses rather than preparing for a sale. Stock options become more valuable when there's a credible path to long-term ownership.

When We Would Sell

Permanent capital doesn't mean we never sell. We will exit a position when:

  • The business fundamentally changes in ways we can't adapt to
  • We've made a mistake in our investment thesis
  • An acquirer can create more value than we can (rare, but possible)
  • Management wants liquidity and we can't provide it internally
  • What we won't do is sell because a fund is expiring or because an investment banker shows us a flattering multiple.

    The Trade-offs

    This approach isn't without costs. Permanent capital structures are harder to raise. Many LPs prefer the defined liquidity of traditional funds. We accept a smaller capital base in exchange for flexibility.

    We also can't promise eye-popping IRRs. We optimize for absolute returns and durability. If you're looking for 3x in 3 years, we're not the right partner.

    Our Commitment

    To founders and operators: we won't flip your company. We'll support you through multiple economic cycles. We'll reinvest in the business rather than extracting dividends.

    To our partners: we'll compound capital patiently. We'll be transparent about performance. We'll never sacrifice long-term value for short-term metrics.

    Building enduring technology companies is hard. It requires patient capital. That's what we provide.

    More Insights

    7 min read

    Security as a Feature, Not an Afterthought

    How we help portfolio companies build security into their products and organizations from day one, and why it's becoming a competitive advantage.

    SecurityOperationsPortfolio Support
    Read article
    10 min read

    What We Look For: Evaluating Infrastructure Software

    A transparent look at our investment criteria for infrastructure and developer tools companies. What makes a business durable enough for permanent ownership.

    StrategyDeveloper ToolsInfrastructure
    Read article

    Want to discuss this further?

    We're always happy to chat with founders and operators about technology infrastructure and investing.